relatives

www.bbcworld.com
"The US Supreme Court has barred enforcement of a law meant to protect children from online pornography, because it probably curbs free speech."
"The high court split five-to-four over the law, which was passed in 1998 and is backed by the Bush administration. Judges said a lower court was right to block the law, as it probably violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution, on freedom of speech."
Now does this sound like evolution logic or what? “probably” violated . . . We don’t know if it DOES violate but we will block it anyway
"The case has been sent back to a lower court for a trial. A new trial will allow the court to discuss any technological developments that may permit adults to see and buy legal material - while keeping it away from children."
While they wait for the techno to develop it is no problem for the children to see it we assume . . . and who said that while that development takes place there won’t be an other techno developer who comes up with another superduper faster easier way to put all that junk on everyone’s computer without them being able to do anything about it?
"One of the judges opposed to the 1998 law warned of 'a potential for extraordinary harm and a serious chill upon protected speech' if the law took effect."
Once again he doesn’t KNOW if there will be harm or not but let’s not take any chances, have to give everybody out there the opportunity to speak their mind (no matter how evil it may be). Like as if there is not already extraordinary harm and a serious chill on the lives of countless people because of porn and child porn. Oh yes how could I forget? There are no absolutes ! ! He is the one making up the rules (so why do we elect people to go to parliament?).
I don’t know, but I wonder what Albert would have thought of what the world has made of the “relativity” thing? Of course here we go with Francis’ son growing up with THE instructor of one generation on the “leap of faith in-the-dark” and him going Orthodox. Talk about a leap! What does Albert’s theory have to do with moral degeneracy? Well as Francis taught that what we think about, philosophy (there is an oxymoron for you “Love of learning” mostly love of justifying themselves) what we think about is what we become (isn’t that somewhere else too?) So as we think in “relative” terms in art and industry and techno and each and every area of out lives we think in the moral area (or is that the other way around). The US went off of the Gold standard for their money. Financial “relativity” (big trouble). There are no absolutes. Albert kept one, can’t go faster than light, but the star trek guys were smarter than him and they made it happen. Now the labs say that they have stopped light in its tracks . . .
Every thing is relative till it infringes on my rights. How to get back the absolutes? (the Absolute Universal Norm - Be Holy!)