Reason

“So unless the Flores Hobbits became more primitive over time - a rather unlikely scenario - they must have branched off the human line at an even earlier date.”

Could an evolutionist claim that it would be an “unlikely scenario” for some form of animal to become more primitive ? Now here is something that is truly amazing, an evolutionist is saying exactly that. My question is simple. Why would it be an unlikely scenario ?

The drive to survive IS pure myth. In the Pirates there is a little dialogue. Speaking of the captain Will Turner asks “is that the reason for the …” and he makes some gestures. The response is immediate and to the point “Reason has nothing to do with it”. There can be NO reason why evolution would Always “improve” something. For the simple reason that ‘reason has nothing to do with it’ ! There can be no reason why anything evolves. Improvement and degeneration are both equally Myth. There can be No reason why anything becomes less primitive. Therefore there is No reason whatever why something could Not become more primitive over time.

Just How Dumb Do These Exponents of Evolution Think That We Are ? ? ?