the human animal

"Regulators have given scientists the green light to create human-animal embryos for research. "

Back to the old ethics question. Who has the right to create an ethics system? Who Are the regulators and who or what gave them the "right" to give 'scientists' the green light?

Who Are the scientists that they should be such an elite group as to warrent a green light?

It realllllly was sooooooo nice of them - the authors of the article, to include the statement
"It is already illegal to implant human-animal embryos in the womb or bring them to term." that makes every thing all right ! ! We trust that our super ethic alists will never think of actually trying to grow a human animal - till the "regulators" give them the green light, of course.

See, it all started when someone said "there ARE NO absolutes" NO ONE has yet proved that there is right and wrong if that is true. There is no 'good, better, or best' if that is true. It is all a figment of our imagination. There is NO reason to have "laws" that lock ANY one up in jail or in a mental institute, if that is true.

Why BOTHER SAYING "it is illegal to implant human-animal embryos in the womb or bring them to term" ? ? ? To what effect is that NON Sence statement? ? ? Some SUPERIOR plackating the general inferior rabble - especiallly those with overblown concepts of what is yuck and what is not, those who might have moral inhibitions about it, or overblown religious fanaticisms - Heaven forbid ????

FuNNNNNNNNNNN YYYYYYYY how it turns out that "Survival" is the only est Good that there is and as such it is THE Superior !

How Can chance plus chance equal superior ?

Hummm, if I could inhabit a giant size human bear body with my superior brain
Ha, I would likely end up just a giant sloth .......