Spying on Freedom
From Wordsmith
"Many people who have grown up in socially, deeply conservative societies
have a very hard time coming to terms with the freedoms available in
liberal countries. Indeed, they take this personal liberty as a sign
of decadence, and often despise Westerners as effete and irreligious.
Unfortunately, they have no idea of the centuries of strife and struggle
that have gone into attaining this level of secularism and freedom from
the church, society, and the state."
Irfan Husain; Existential Dilemma Forced by Clash of Civilisations;
Khaleej Times (Dubai, United Arab Emirates); Dec 2, 2004.
liberal Synonyms:, bounteous, bountiful, freehanded, generous, handsome, munificent, openhanded
3: tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition
a. Archaic. Permissible or appropriate for a person of free birth; befitting a lady or gentleman.
b. Obsolete. Morally unrestrained; licentious.
I dare say that there are a lot of North Americans who have no idea that the heritage of NA is the reason for the “freedom and liberalism” that we hold as our inheritance from those who first came here from Europe. I am sorry that Irfan Husain does not know that the “secularism and liberalism and freedom” that is practiced in NA today is Not that on which our culture was founded. What he seems to see is the third meaning, ‘not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy or tradition’ where as the Archaic definition is quite appropriate for the society that came here to practice what the Bible teaches. Both Canada and the States were first settled (by Europeans) by Protestants who were looking for a country where they could act in a manner ‘permissible and appropriate for a person of free birth (the new birth as defined in the Bible) and befitting ladies and gentlemen’ !! Again I am not sure why dictionary.com says that ‘morally unrestrained; licentious’ is an obsolete definition for liberal because that defines NA today very well. It wasn’t ‘centuries of strife and struggle’ that won the bounteous freehanded generous … society that we enjoy, it was the complete surrender of themselves to God !!
Paul in the Bible had to deal with freedom spies. There were a number of issues on which he had to put pen to paper in order to establish what his freedom was, why his freedom existed and what the parameters of it really were. One of his big problems was exactly a group of people who grew up in a ‘deeply conservative society’ and could not comprehend this new fangled ‘freedom in Christ’. Even Jesus Himself had that problem ! And today there is hardly a religious group that can look at any other without crying foul.
Of course there are also some who want to turn back the clock and climb under some old ‘protective’ cover of an orthodox authoritarianism.
We are fast loosing our freedom exactly because we are disconnected from the church and society and the state. Ask anyone why they came here from their old country. The answer is because it was so bad there and it is so good here; we are loosing our freedom because we have not told the newcomers the reason for the “freedom”. And we have not kept up with our own new generations, telling them it is not freedom from authoritarianism and orthodoxy and tradition but rather freedom to Christ.
