no brainer

A single-celled ball about the size of a grape may provide an explanation for one of the mysteries of fossil history.
Writing in Current Biology, researchers say the creature leaves tracks on the seabed which mirror fossilised tracks left up to 1.8 billion years ago.
Many palaeontologists believe only multi-celled organisms could have made these tracks.
"We were looking for pretty animals that have eyes, are coloured, or glow in the dark; instead, the most interesting find was the organism that was blind, brainless, and completely covered in mud," he said.

They have been rolling around on the bottom of the sea for the past couple of hundred years while evolution has been trying to find them 1.8billion years ago ! Fantastic !

conception of duty

A Frenchman, Joseph Gobineau (1816-82) wrote, "Everyone wants to perfect himself through a conception of duty" and "all have an immensely sincere desire to seek what is good."

Yes we all have that sense of duty. But it Did NOT come from God. The absolutely definatively unique characteristic of what God has done and told us about in the Bible IS that although NO one Can in fact through ANY duty what-so-ever perfect himself or herself what God did can perfect an individual. Even many of those who should comprehend what the Bible IS saying insist on reverting to moral expectation and obligation to become perfect.

The Bible tells us "the just shall live by faith"!

One can not accept what Jesus did and then proceed to do something that they perceive to be able to fix them up, or to do what someone else with not only a personal conception of duty but also an authoritarian self obliging duty to fix other people says will fix them.

Although the Absolute Universal Norm IS

"Be Holy"
and is defined by the example "as I am Holy" as spoken by God.

there is ONLY ONE norm under it.

"Faith"

and not just any faith
not some 'leap into the dark'
Absolute trust that what Jesus did will perfect me.
Jesus died and if I appropriate His death as my own He will raise me back to life in conformity to the AUN.

multiple choice

It is true that one does NOT have to know anything at all about the theory of evolution to effectively study biology, the science of life or living matter in all its forms and phenomena, and have a successful career in knowing how living things work. One does not Have to know the origin of the car to know how to drive it and how to take it apart and fix it and put it back together or even to be an expert on the automobile. Who cares who made the first auto mobile? One of the biggest arguments against the theory of evolution is the absolute insistance of its exponents to include it in every aspect of our daily life as is possible to do. We used to laugh at the communists when they put up the Berlin wall, why didn't they put in a picture window instead? What are they trying to hide, why are they putting Sooo much effort into keeping their own people in?

The insistance of the evolutionist in his ideas is as contemptable as that.

I quote, "it doesn't matter just put down the answer that they are looking for". That by what is reportedly a "teacher" of science ! ! !

They tell us that science is neutral. That science is always open to ideas, theories, imagination. Always open to a new look at something in order to find the truth.

Baaaa HUMBUG ! ! !

This "teacher" just gave herself away. Science is NOT looking for truth. It IS looking for a regurgitation of current politically correct. (This also goes for the global "global warming" epademic. Ignore the fact that world temperatures are going down again) (ignore the fact that every global epidemic of disease that has ever occured has run its course, We have ended it with our advanced understanding of it and our fight against it)

Teach, why will you not tell the truth. You CAN study biology immensly successfullly without knowing a single solitary thing about the origin of life ! ! It is NOT a requirement to knowing all that science can find out about living things. Students could learn ever so much about the world around us IF they did not have to spend SO much time and effort on some God forsaken theory of how we all got to be here! There IS another reason why the evolutionist is pushing his and her adgenda so blatantly. (my guess is that no one can get a high enough mark to advance to further studies, ie. go to university, if they leave out the 'answers' to the evolutionary biased questions ! ! !)

"just put a little mark beside the multiple choice answer that they ABSOLUTELY INSIST you MUST do in order to pass the test"

Indeed ! ! !

multiple choice ? ?

material efficacy

" 'The doctrine of the material efficacy of prayer reduces the Creator to a cosmic bellhop of a not very bright or reliable kind.' -Herbert J. Muller, educator, historian, and author (1905-1980)

Herbert J. Muller (1905-1980) was an American historian, academic, government official and author. He was educated at Cornell University. He taught at Purdue and Cornell, served in the Department of State, the War Production Board, and frequently lectured abroad.

Religion and Freedom in the Modern World
Does religion promote or impair the cause of freedom? Herbert Muller attempts to answer this question by surveying the social effects of religion, focusing upon the last 150 years of Christianity. "

If the doctrine of material efficacy of prayer does reduce the Creator to a 'cosmic bellhop' He wouldn't be the Creator. Unless prayer does have material efficacy The Creator couldn't have created anything.

deliberate decisions

" The Austrian father who allegedly imprisoned and abused his daughter for 24 years has been charged with murdering one of their seven children.
prosecutors have levelled charges at him over the death of the seventh child, a baby born in the underground chamber.
"Despite recognising the baby's life-threatening situation, he deliberately decided not to intervene," prosecutors said in the charge sheet against Mr Fritzl.
He has told police that he took the body of the child and incinerated it in a furnace.
Under Austrian law the act of not seeking medical attention for the newborn child is classified as murder. "

and still people can not see that the deliberate decision made by abortionists Not to give medical attention to newborn children who are still alive is NOT OK ! ! None of them has been charged with murder.