Guerilla

There they are !
The Red Coats !
Strung out across the landscape for all to see.
There is nothing to hide,
They rule.

“battle field visibility”
That is what it was all about.
“We want to be seen.”
There is something to be said
For moral enhancement to.

Gorilla warfare,
Passé term for
Any kind of fight that
Was not rock em sock em
Stand up toe to toe and duke it out.

Gorilla warfare.
Run to the cops
Tell them that some one is doing some thing wrong
Supply email address of the offender
And run for cover.

Above all, remain Anonymous !

Studies have shown that gorilla tactics are used by the weak side in any conflict. The sole reason that they may sometimes supercede is a rotten core of the extablishment. Some moral degeneracy exists that said gorilla does not want to publish …

Anon

It is with deep regret that I must post …
Because I will show off my absolute ignorance of things DNA.

Anonymous you are absolutely correct, I do not understand DNA or the concepts behind it and my post is absolutely ridiculous.

Just today there is a new article on BBC that proves it. “There is increasing evidence that problems in certain areas of the brain may contribute to feelings of sexual attraction towards children.” “In the UK, many experts are looking to the biology of the brain to explain not just paedophilia, but other types of compulsive criminality.”

What’s “criminality”. Shouldn’t that word be relegated to where ever such words as ‘fag’ and ‘niger’ have been since there is no such thing as a criminal ? ? How could BBC of all institutions have made such bad, bad choice as to use that word “criminality” when they themselves just gave proof that crime is DNA and sex crime is rooted firmly in our jeans ? ? It is not crime it is only faulty DNA ! ! There is no “criminology” it is pleasureology ! Studies have shown that pleasure people get a great rush out of what they do just like being on crystal meth or opium or such …

standard

Isn’t it funny
DNA the biggggggest thing to hit the world since … well I don’t know since what. DNA this and DNA that and all the world turns on DNA. We can pick up DNA from critters tens of thousands of years old and dream of recreating them ! We put people behind bars or let them out on the basis of DNA, we decide what is reasonable human behaviour on the basis of DNA, we argue that it proves that we all ultimately came from a common pot.
But one little baby bamboozled science. ONLY about eighty, 80, years old. Impossible to figure out who it was. Just can’t put the DNA together again.

Discrimmination
Dirty, dirty word ! In most circles. But then most of them could not be honest if they tried. The way the world talks all discrimination is evil and bad. I personally have never, Never, yet met any one who is not discriminating ! A discriminating pallet, “having excellent taste or judgment” in fine food is just fine. Oh, yes, what we are talking about is “to make a distinction in favor of or against a person or thing on the basis of the group, class, or category to which the person or thing belongs rather than according to actual merit; show partiality:” Everyone shows partiality. The fags of thirty years ago did. The ‘gays’ of today do. If you do not react to what I have just said you are a most astounding person ! I am so sad to see the gay word “gay” disappear, it was such a gay word. Still as much as I am sad to see certain minorities showing their partialities by changing the definition of words, like ‘family’ or ‘marriage’ or ‘gay’, to fit their partialities just because they can not live with the reality behind the word, and long so much to be able to, I am glad that the word ‘gay’ has disappeared. I am still gay sometimes but now I am the one who has to keep it in the closet just in case someone gets the wrong idea ! It would be too confusing to have one word with two opposite meanings. Like it or not there is no room for gay people in a church that says NO. "Ha ! It is in my genes !" you say. Sure it is. “I am not responsible for it, I just want a chance to be me!” you say. OK. Then let me be me. And let us in this democratic country make up the rules of how we live here ! When I went to school “democracy” ment “government of the people, for the people, by the people”. Yes, Yes, I know the definition of that has change too, though I can not find what the present definition is … “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.” This does not sound tooo bad, but it reallllly smacks of lip service to an honourable way of managing a country. And it in fact leaves the power up for grabs. “A state of society characterized by formal equality of rights and privileges.” This is most likely the best meaning for the word, concept, today, it really does not say anything at all. It can be used to back any and all “rights and privileges” no matter what they are when they were created or how, or how many or how few claim them and absolutely disregards any kind of standard human character ! What it really means is anarchy, ‘the people did that which was right in their own eyes’. I can discriminate good chocolate when I taste it but I can not discriminate bad behaviour when I meet it ? And exclude you from where I am. You would not let me into your house when ever I want, helping myself to what ever I want – stay out of mine ! And while you are at it stay out of my church ! No problem, I will stay out of your church. ‘A rose by any other name is still a rose’ so they say and a church is a church and if yours is Not a church then show me why I should have to stay out of it ? If it is a church, My job is to keep the church as it should be. By the way, why in hell would you insist on calling it church anyway ? ? ? (can’t call it a bar or a club, too many rules and attendance is entirely at the discretion of the owner … church is the only place where there are no rules – I read a book about that once, “Martin Luther has the sole responsibility for creating the secular state, ‘here I stand, I can do no other”) We have to call it marriage and family and church BUT only with your own definition ! And that is not discrimination ? ?

I will discriminate for decent, good, right, beneficial, proper, standard human character and activity where ever and when ever I have to.